Should social media be banned free essay sample

Social media has made an effect on the modern world together. Some people consider social media to have a very negative impact on people, especially our younger generation, causing inappropriate language being used. It is a topic that divides an opinion. People say social media is an amazing tool, but others worry about the impact it has on lives. Here are some reasons why you should not ban social media. During the royal wedding, a lot of people went crazy. There were people trending all across the world about it. Thousands of people around the world were able to share one special moment. In a local article is has been proven that ‘more than 300 tweets per second’ were filling the well branched website, Twitter. Also on Facebook there were ’74 status updates per second. ’ This has shown that there were millions of viewers watching the royal wedding. The royal wedding was a special, yet memorable moment it has been shared through social media. We will write a custom essay sample on Should social media be banned or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In addition to that many people knew about the wedding through social media. If we did not have social media, not that many people would have known about the wedding. Not everyone has a TV so that’s where social media comes into recognition. Whoever wanted to watch Prince William and Kate Middleton’s big day could watch it on a live stream through YouTube. ‘Google was expecting 400 million views. ’ Google is a massive piece of media. Many people watched the live stream on YouTube. The royal wedding got more views that Barak Obama’s inauguration in 2009. 70 million people online viewed his inauguration itself! 2 billion people worldwide watched the royal wedding. There was a massive frenzy. A 14 year old killed herself after getting bullied on a site called, ask. fm. After her death her father made a Facebook page on her behalf. ‘This page has nearly 30,000 likes. ’ This shows that many people support her dad for his loss. Mr Smith has asked people to sign an e-petition to introduce safeguarding measures on sites used by children. Her dad is looking out for other children and does not want this to happen to any other child in the future. The petition says ‘please sign if you would like the government to step in and insist that ask. fm and similar sites help us protect our young people. ’ Due to all the people liking this page they are eager for a change to sites and want to help the younger generation. Social media can help make a change to websites like ask. fm. A Facebook page can make a difference; it’s better to do something than do nothing. ‘Through the UK council of child internet safety we are working with social networking sites and internet providers to make the Internet a safer place for young people. ’ The chief executive of the NSPCC wants to make a difference. There have been many concerns put forward by academics, people of the older generation and particularly the media about the apparent dangers of social network sites and some have even asserted that a ban from them be put in place. Some of these concerns include the breakdown of communication, ‘cyber bullying’ and problems associated with exposing personal details on these sites. In addition, they have expressed distress about social network sites being used as a means of communication for terrorist groups and causing people to become dangerously addicted to them. There are many reasons why social media should be banned. Here are some reasons why. Social media is an ideal place to create a hostile environment. ‘Hide behind their screens’ I bet you one person has said something nasty to you through a computer. These people are scared to say it to the victim’s faces. They hide, its called cyber bullying. The people behind the screens would be showing their anger but its nit fair on the victim to get hurt. This will create a hostile environment for everyone affected. Many parents dislike social networking. They believe that sites such ask. fm and Facebook attract child predators. Others believe that cyber-bullying takes place on these sites. Still others feel that social networks distract a child from his or her schoolwork. Normally a school child’s after school is routine is to go on the computer and finish off some homework but ‘86% of children open Facebook up first. ’ This is a huge distraction, they might forget to do some homework and start talking to friends or scroll through there newsfeed just to see what has happened in a day. Who knows if the work will get done at its best standards? Ask. fm is a social networking site that allows people to post questions to anyone anonymously. ‘The cruel nature of cyber bullying allows perpetrators to remain anonymous. ’ Because people are allowed to say anything anonymous then they can say anything. Anything. When the royal wedding was taking place the BBC was putting a live stream on bbc. co. uk but the BBC was ‘unable to cope. ’ The BBC website wobbled under the strain as huge numbers of Britons tried to access its coverage. So many people wanted to watch the live stream. Even though BBC is new media they couldn’t cope because too many people wanted to go onto the website. The London riot is an example of how social media can be used. There are the cases of young teenage boys and girls who went on looting sprees night after night. The youngest defendant was a shocking 11 years old. Some of these young people allegedly used Twitter and Facebook to organise themselves and encourage their friends to join in. However, whatever the cause of the riots, something amazing happened, which should not be forgotten or overlooked; Londoners of all backgrounds, including young people, came out in force to defend and clean up their city. Rather poetically, the clean-up was organised using the very same social networking mechanisms that were used to orchestrate the chaos. In a truly unique and very British display of defiance and civic pride, thousands of people formed an army of cleaners, equipped with brushes and bags. David Cameron has been trying to tell us that we need to build the Big Society; this response showed that his empty rhetoric is redundant, because for the large part, we already have the Big Society. Social media can be seen as both positive and negative for the following positive reasons are: people can communicate easier and share a special moment that has an effect on the world. For the following negative reasons they are: cyber bullying and lack of concentration for the young generation. Based on that I think social media should not be banned because it’s easier to communicate to people around the world and you can get information quicker. It is the persons choice if they want to cyber bully another person ad it is their education not mine. But we can change the way people use social media.

Discursive Essay †Footballers Do Not Deserve The High Salaries They Command

Discursive Essay – Footballers Do Not Deserve The High Salaries They Command Free Online Research Papers Discursive Essay Footballers Do Not Deserve The High Salaries They Command Many people think that footballers are paid too much money for doing too little effort. However, this can be argued because they are people who have dedicated their entire life to this sport and therefore they should be rewarded. This leads us to the question: Do footballers deserve high salaries? Firstly, some famous footballers are paid huge amounts of money such as Ronaldo who are paid millions of euros every year. This makes us feel that it is unreasonable that there are so many people dying of famine in the world and these people are given so much money for performing an insignificant effort. It even make us feel irritated to know how these football players waste their money in wants that are of no use such as Etoo, (a famous football player in Football Club Barcelona, colloquially said by the Spanish people â€Å"Barsa†) who possesses about fifteen expensive cars. A lot of money is needed for many purposes: for example for the aid of starving people in the less economically developed countries or in the building of more hospitals for our own health and security. Secondly, people argue that there are other professions that provide far much more for the population that footballers do and that they are poorly paid in comparison. They should be paid more. Other people even think that what they are paid would be justified if they performed better in the actual matches. Many people say that one goal in a ninety-minute match or a draw implies an awful quality performance. On the other hand, the opinion of the spectators is that these players have dedicated their full lives to their job which involves harsh training and the maintenance of physical fitness through intense daily training so he has to be under the pressure of their trainer who requires them to be completely fit and train strictly. Furthermore, apart from the pressure exerted from their instructor, they are under the pressure of the audience. They have always to play correctly and not make any mistake so that the media and the public will not criticize them. A single error would represent a possible end of the career of that player. In addition to this, we have to consider the fact that the age of retirement for a professional football player is of about 30-40 years (depending of the physical state of the player) which means that this person relies on the money he has gained in his short lifetime as a professional footballer therefore football players need the money for the future so they can sustain themselves and their future generations. Finally, the football business is private, no public money pays for the bills so why should we care about how much are the players paid? It is a sport that is enjoyed by millions of people and it is known everywhere so it is maybe true that these players are worth the money, that their talent deserves this money. In conclusion, my opinion is that footballers don’t perform such a simple, undemanding and effortless job, they dedicate their lives to this sport so that the people can enjoy it and it is quite complex for them to maintain their physical strength and fitness to survive ninety minutes running. They also are under a lot of pressure from their instructors, media and the whole audience. However, I do consider that the sum of money they are paid is quite over exaggerated, it is too much and even if it is not that easy to become a professional player, the effort is not worth millions of euros and I believe that some of these money should be for other purposes such as stopping the famine and starvation in the world. So footballers should be compensated for their effort but with so much money. Research Papers on Discursive Essay - Footballers Do Not Deserve The High Salaries They CommandTrailblazing by Eric AndersonThe Hockey GameThe Effects of Illegal ImmigrationTwilight of the UAWHip-Hop is ArtResearch Process Part OneLifes What IfsMarketing of Lifeboy Soap A Unilever ProductIncorporating Risk and Uncertainty Factor in Capital19 Century Society: A Deeply Divided Era

National Geographic guide to the national parks of the United States Essay - 4

National Geographic guide to the national parks of the United States - Essay Example The source further provides insights on the activities and sites that one needs to photograph. Additionally, the site provides guidelines on how one needs to conduct research on travel photography. The guardian’s travel section is a credible source for travel topography essay. This is because the site is a research site bearing reference lists that appear comprehensive in their coverage on matters of travel topography. The author also presented relevant context and background information. In addition, the site has a research methodology that is presented to the reader in a right manner. Consequently, the information presented in the source is applicable and valid today. The source specifies some of the tips that one need to consider during travel photography. One needs to understand the traditions and customs of a given place. Subsequently, the source outlines the ways of discovering the life rhythm of life in a given place and figure out what exactly to shoot. Digital is lowe r in resolution than film because its images have high signal-to-noise while film images have higher spatial resolution because of the fine-grained film. In addition, long digital exposures add random white dots to photos resulting to a noisier image than film. As a result, a development of large prints for photos, with a lot of texture that needs preservation, such as landscapes, is favored by prints from film cameras. Film blends light and colors better than digital cameras. The camera’s sensors are made up of millions of tiny pixels that combines to give an image while film isn’t split up in such a linear way (â€Å"National Geographic guide to the national parks of the United States†, 64) High-end film cameras are currently less expensive and will not become obsolete in a few years’ time. Their maintenance cost is also low as film cameras require little power to operate, so battery life is longer than in digital camera. Although the cost of film devel opment might be